Amicus Brief
The AHA weighs in on a number of issues of importance to hospitals and health systems, as well as the patients they care for, as they come before the court. Below are our most recent friend-of-the-court briefs.
Twelve national organizations, including the AHA, today urged the U.S. Solicitor General to file an amicus brief in support of the providers in a U.S. Supreme Court case concerning whether Medicaid recipients and providers may sue to ensure that states comply with the federal Medicaid statute and…
The AHA, AAMC, CHA, FAH, NACH, and NAPHHS today filed a joint amici brief in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals opposing a lower court decision finding the ACA's individual mandate unconstitutional.
AHA and other hospital associations file amici brief in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in support of the lower court's decision upholding the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
AHA and other hospital associations file a joint amici brief in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in support of the lower court's decision upholding the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
U.S. Supreme Court \(No. 09-837\) Re: Student Exemption from FICA tax
AHA files an amicus brief in support of an appeal by Tuomey Healthcare System of Sumter, SC, of a lower court's award of more than 4 million to the federal government based on alleged violations of the Stark Law
Information obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request cannot provide the basis for the personal knowledge private individuals must have in order to pursue a False Claims Act case, the AHA argues in the amicus brief filed December 6, in the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Georgia Supreme Court declared unconstitutional the state's cap on noneconomic damages in medical liability cases, which was enacted as part of tort reform in 2005.
Illinois Supreme Court denied an appeal by Provena Covenant Medical Center to regain its property-tax exemption
The AHA filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that state or local government resports, audits or investigations cannot be the basis for the personal knowledge required of a private individual in pursuing a FCA case.