Report: District court denies preliminary injunction, upholding Maryland law protecting 340B pricing for contract pharmacy arrangements

Sep 09, 2024 - 04:02 PM
court-900x400

A district court in Baltimore Sept. 5 ruled against drug companies and PhRMA, denying their attempt to obtain a preliminary injunction against 340B pricing for contract pharmacy arrangements in Maryland, according to . The AHA filed amicus briefs defending Maryland’s law against this drug industry challenge July 29 and Aug. 2, in addition to similar briefs filed in Missouri Aug. 29 and West Virginia Aug. 16.
 

Related News Articles

Headline
AHA defends HHS decision to reject 340B rebate models by drug companies
The AHA today filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, defending the Department of Health and Human Services’ decision to…
Headline
HHS announces new 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program
The Department of Health and Human Services today issued a notice announcing a 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program as a voluntary mechanism for qualifying drug…
Headline
Lawmakers introduce bill codifying 340B providers’ use of contract pharmacies to dispense discounted drugs
Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Calif., and Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., today introduced the 340B Patients Act, AHA-supported legislation that would codify 340B providers'…
Headline
AHA files brief defending Colorado’s 340B contract pharmacy law
The AHA July 16 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado in defense of the state’s 340B contract pharmacy law prohibiting…
Headline
Missouri district court rules in favor of state’s 340B law
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri July 11 granted a motion by the state to dismiss claims by AbbVie that the state’s 340B contract…
Headline
District court rules in favor of Tennessee’s 340B contract pharmacy law
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee June 30 denied a motion for a preliminary injunction by AbbVie in its lawsuit against the state’s…