The AHA and American Society of Health-System Pharmacists Nov. 14 urged House and Senate leaders to oppose any policies that fail to take into account the costs of safely providing drug administration services to the complex patients that hospitals serve.  
  
鈥淧roposals to reduce reimbursements for drug administration services in hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) inappropriately equate care provided in these hospital clinics with less complex care provided at freestanding physician offices,鈥 they wrote. 鈥淭he care is not equivalent, and current payment rates take into account these important differences. 鈥 We are concerned that these proposed policies will force hospitals and pharmacists to scale back some of the critical services they are able to provide to their patients. Given that Medicare beneficiaries who seek care in HOPDs are more likely to be sicker and more medically complex than those treated at independent physicians鈥 offices, this may result in reduced access to care for some of our most medically vulnerable patients.鈥 
 

Related News Articles

Headline
The Supreme Court April 29 ruled 7-2 in favor of the Department of Health and Human Services in a case that challenged how HHS applied Congress鈥 formula for鈥
Headline
The White House April 15 released an executive order directing federal agencies to undertake a broad range of tasks aimed at reducing the costs of prescription鈥
Headline
In comments Nov. 12 to majority and minority leaders of the House and Senate, the AHA requested that Congress act on key priorities for hospitals and health鈥
Headline
Senators Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Maggie Hassan, D-N.H., Nov. 1 released a policy framework detailing a plan to impose site-neutral payments on hospitals. Site鈥
Headline
The AHA Aug. 13 commented to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission in anticipation of the commission鈥檚 2024-2025 cycle. The AHA urged MedPAC to carefully鈥
Headline
In response to a recent Washington Post op-ed favoring site-neutral payment, AHA President and CEO Rick Pollack writes in a letter to the editor published鈥