The Health Resources and Services Administration is expected to propose a further delay in the effective date of a final rule on drug ceiling prices and civil monetary penalties for manufacturers in the 340B drug savings program, according to a notice under review at the Office of Management and Budget. HRSA has delayed the effective date of the rule many times. The most recent delay, which was announced last August, set July 1 as the effective date for the rule. It is not clear what date HRSA will propose for the new effective date. AHA in September opposed any further delay of the rule. "Given the skyrocketing prescription drug price increases that have presented hospitals and patients with remarkable challenges, the 340B program is as critical as ever in helping expand and improve access to comprehensive health care services for vulnerable patients and communities,鈥 said Joanna Hiatt Kim, AHA vice president of payment policy. 鈥淲e would be very disappointed if another delay of the 340B ceiling price and civil monetary penalties rule is proposed, especially considering that HRSA began rulemaking on this issue eight years ago.鈥

Related News Articles

Headline
The AHA, joined by several other national groups representing 340B hospitals, Aug. 8 urged the Health Resources and Services Administration to extend the鈥
Headline
The AHA today filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, defending the Department of Health and Human Services鈥 decision to鈥
Headline
The Department of Health and Human Services today issued a notice announcing a 340B Rebate Model Pilot Program as a voluntary mechanism for qualifying drug鈥
Headline
Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Calif., and Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., today introduced the 340B Patients Act, AHA-supported legislation that would codify 340B providers'鈥
Headline
The AHA July 16 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado in defense of the state鈥檚 340B contract pharmacy law prohibiting鈥
Headline
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri July 11 granted a motion by the state to dismiss claims by AbbVie that the state鈥檚 340B contract鈥