The Health Resources and Services Administration today  to May 22 the effective date of its  on 340B drug ceiling prices and civil monetary penalties for manufacturers, and invited comments on whether a delay to Oct. 1 would be more appropriate. The rule was set to take effect March 21 following an earlier two-week . 鈥淸The Department of Health and Human Services] believes that the delay of the effective date is necessary to consider questions of fact, law and policy raised in the rule, consistent with the 鈥楻egulatory Freeze Pending Review鈥 memorandum,鈥 the notice states. 鈥淚n addition, HHS believes that the delay of the effective date is necessary to provide regulated entities sufficient time to implement the requirements of the rule.鈥 HRSA will accept comments through April 17.

Related News Articles

Headline
The AHA May 1 expressed concerns (LINK) to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services about the payment process established under the Medicare鈥
Headline
The AHA April 30 released a report highlighting how hospitals and health systems continue to experience significant financial headwinds that can challenge鈥
Headline
The Supreme Court April 29 ruled 7-2 in favor of the Department of Health and Human Services in a case that challenged how HHS applied Congress鈥 formula for鈥
Headline
Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee Chairman Bill Cassidy, M.D., R-La., today released a report detailing findings from an investigation鈥
Headline
The AHA April 18 filed friend-of-the-court briefs in three cases in support of Louisiana's 340B contract pharmacy law that prohibits drug companies from鈥
Headline
A Minnesota state court April 15 dismissed a lawsuit filed by PhRMA challenging the state鈥檚 law protecting 340B pricing for contract pharmacy arrangements. The鈥