The Health Resources and Services Administration today released its long-awaited implementing an Affordable Care Act requirement that the agency establish a process to resolve disputes between 340B covered entities and drug manufacturers.

The final rule sets forth the administrative dispute process, including the composition of the decision-making body, the scope of claims, the information needed to support such claims, as well as the timeframe for the proceedings. It does not, however, directly address the issues AHA has raised with drug manufacturers restricting 340B hospitals鈥 use of contract pharmacy arrangements. 

In a statement, AHA Executive Vice President Tom Nickels said, 鈥淭he AHA has long believed that an administrative dispute resolution process for the 340B drug pricing program is an important step forward in protecting 340B hospitals and clinics that have been overcharged by drug manufacturers through the program. This process should have been finalized a full decade ago, as the law and Congress called for.

鈥淗owever, on its own, this ADR process is not sufficient to address drug companies鈥 repeated illegal attempts to attack 340B hospitals, and the patients and communities they serve. This includes their most recent efforts to undermine the program by limiting the distribution of certain 340B drugs to eligible hospitals, despite no statutory provisions allowing for such actions. These illegal acts require immediate relief rather than an ADR process.

鈥淲e continue to urge the Department of Health and Human Services鈥 Health Resources and Services Administration to take swift and decisive action to halt these pernicious tactics from drug companies and ensure that 340B drugs remain available and accessible to vulnerable communities across the country.鈥

AHA member 340B hospitals will receive a Special Bulletin with more details on the final rule.

Related News Articles

Headline
The U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee June 30 denied a motion for a preliminary injunction by AbbVie in its lawsuit against the state鈥檚鈥
Headline
The AHA June 27 filed an amicus brief in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee that defends the state鈥檚 340B contract pharmacy law鈥
Chairperson's File
Public
Advocacy is a core part of the work of the AHA, protecting and sustaining what hospitals and health systems need to truly care for our communities. We often鈥
Headline
A U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia judge June 27 ruled against Johnson & Johnson and sided with the Department of Health and Human Services鈥
Headline
The AHA June 16 released a report showing hospitals that participated in the 340B Drug Pricing Program are not only subject to disproportionately greater鈥
Chairperson's File
Public
Advocacy is such an important part of what we do as hospitals and health systems 鈥 and what the AHA does on behalf of our field 鈥 to help ensure that we get鈥